Git packfiles use delta compression, storing only the diff when a 10MB file changes by one line, while the objects table stores each version in full. A file modified 100 times takes about 1GB in Postgres versus maybe 50MB in a packfile. Postgres does TOAST and compress large values, but that’s compressing individual objects in isolation, not delta-compressing across versions the way packfiles do, so the storage overhead is real. A delta-compression layer that periodically repacks objects within Postgres, or offloads large blobs to S3 the way LFS does, is a natural next step. For most repositories it still won’t matter since the median repo is small and disk is cheap, and GitHub’s Spokes system made a similar trade-off years ago, storing three full uncompressed copies of every repository across data centres because redundancy and operational simplicity beat storage efficiency even at hundreds of exabytes.
07:58, 28 февраля 2026Мир
。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
塑造一个真实、包容的世界《桃源村日志》不仅是波波对美好生活的想象，更是她对人性和成长观察实验。
40. 2026年政府工作报告 - 永安市, www.ya.gov.cn/zwgk/gzbg/2…